Case 15:

X + 3 = 8

On trust and letting go of control

Dany was born at 35 weeks weighing 2430 grams . He is now 3 weeks old and 2860 grams, and his mother does not know how to keep up feeding him breastmilk anymore. He is breastfeeding occasionally, but they have been told it is too tiring for their baby,  and when she does breastfeed him he falls asleep within 3 minutes.

She is so tired and her milk production has dropped from 60cc per pumping session to an average of 30cc at a time.

Will it ever get better or should she give up, they ask.

When we put Dany at the breast, he searches enthousiasically for the nipple, takes a few sucks and then dozes off with the nipple in his mouth. In a basically healthy infant, this could mean a couple of things:

  1. He is not hungry, we have the timing wrong.
  2. He has the experience and the expectation that there will be no or insufficient milk, and is not investing anymore and waits for the supplemental feed that will come afterwards.
  3. He has too little grip on the breast to trigger the sucking reflex and come to drinking.

We could rule out option 1: Dany had woken up on his own, gave clear feeding signals and had his last feed over 2 hours ago.

To test option 2, I use a syringe to drip some expressed breastmilk into the corner of his mouth next to the breast. Immediately his eyes open and he starts drinking for a while. But he keeps dozing off again, until I drip some more milk. Apparently he doesn’t seem to realise that with action he will more milk, and lets the breast slip out of his mouth.

His latch is relatively shallow so we move on to option 3. In concorde position with Erykah supporting the breast into his mouth he can stay on the breast longer. And after a few tries Dany clearly gets excited, relaxes and really lies down to drink with big slow jaw movements.

Erykah gets tears in her eyes, she hasn’t had him at the breast like this for the last few weeks. This is what she wants, but now she questions if she will ever be able to manage this alone.

She feels so trapped between the pump, her baby and her own fatigue. Pumping and giving the bottle is double duty, but they know he is getting all the milk he needs. And as long as Dany does not drink at the breast, she cannot stop pumping. And even if he were to go to the breast she will not have enough milk to feed him. It feels hopeless and she and her partner are despondent.

When I suggest that she is not failing in any way if she decides to stop trying to make more milk or if she stops breastfeeding altogether, her partner nods with relief.

Erykah also nods, yet at the same time says with tears in her eyes that she is not ready to stop. She had to readjust all her plans and wishes about her start with motherhood: giving birth prematurely, not giving birth at home, missing the first hour… and now letting go of breastfeeding too? She is not ready yet.

While we are talking to Erykah’s great surprise, Dany startsdrinking at the breast with audible big gulps, and her other breast suddenly starts leaking, milk pouring out. That hasn’t happened for the past two weeks.

Apparently, breastfeeding is indeed very important to Erykah. And so it could well be that for her latching on stimulates more milkproduction than pumping (for a different perspective, click here for case study 1).

‘But if she stops pumping and only offers breast, how much should we supplement and with what milk?’ her partner rightly asks. He thinks it sounds risky, his son is still so small and so vulnerable.  And I get that.

This is when I suggest the 5+x=8 challenge…

Discussion

In my practice, I find that often the biggest hurdle on the road from supplementary feeding to breastfeeding is parental confidence. Supplementary feeding is measurable and verifiable, breastfeeding much less so. This is particularly important if:

  • A baby is extra vulnerable, for example due to premature birth or illness.
  • Parents have had the actual experience that breastfeeding was insufficient to feed the baby, e.g. in case of too much weight loss in the first days postpartum.
  • Parents have little experience with babies in general, and have a profession in which measuring=knowing plays a major role
  • Pumping session yield substantially less milk than the baby needs.

And if several of these issues are present the percieved risk of the uncontolability of breastfeeding van be (too) high.

And if milk production is indeed insufficient to feed the baby 100%, then less supplementary feeding can increase the frequency of feeding and thus the incentive. But if then the baby is systematically underfed and the stress levels in parents and baby are too high, parents get discouraged and the baby may start refusing the breast.

So what needs to be done is twofold:

  1. The baby needs the experience that drinking at the breast (by now) can be effective and sufficient.
  2. The parents need time and experience to build or regain confidence if they like breastfeeding.

In these situations, challenging in blocks of time can work well.

Parents choose a 5-hour period when they are at their best. In this block of time, the baby receives only the breast with no supplementary feeding, or much less supplementary feeding after the breast than usual. The rest of the 24 hours baby is fed in the way parents have come to trust.

This means that for 19 hours the baby gets the feedings that parents know are enough for the baby. Most parents feel ok knowing that their baby possibly gets slighly less than 100% for 5 hours a day. They can trust baby is their baby is not at risk during this period.

By giving only breast and minimal supplemental feed:

  • If milkproduction is too low, the stimulus during these 5 hours will be higer,because with less supplementary feeding the baby will want to drink (much) more often,
  • If trust is the issue in baby and/or parent, during this time all can build up a new experience of breast being sufficient.
  • If baby has never needed to ‘invest’ in drinking actively at breast because there would always be a bottle afterwards, they can discover that they’d get hungry and get an incentive to start drinking more actively*

*which only is an option if and when the baby is technically able to drink effectively at breast: check tone, mouthanatomy, healthissues and correct latch if needed beforehand.

If supplemental feeding is cut down too fast stress may build up gradually and result in breast refusal. In my experience this typically happens only after 2 days in which hunger gradually builds up.  And that is a setback that many parents are unable to overcome. To avoid this, I usually recommend cutting down on supplementary feeding in the 19 other hours more slowly rather than more quickly.

An example of this plan

Between 7 a.m. and 12 p.m., the baby gets mainly breast and minimal to no supplementation.

During the breastfeed mother supports effective drinking actively: full attention, relaxed feeding position, personal comfort, bare skin contact if it feels good, breathing, good latch and supporting the breast where necessary.

Per feeding, the baby receives in this time block:

– no supplementary feeding if normally < 40 cc per feeding is needed or if milk production with pumping is sufficient.

– 50% of the supplementary feeding if 60 cc or more is normally needed.

The full feed is 30 mins max per session, or as the baby is actively drinking. This can be 2 breasts but also alternating feedings with 3-4 breasts (switch feeding).

After feeding, there is at least 1 hour between the end of a feeding and the start of the next feeding. It is to be expected if baby is slightly restless but relaxes with body contact, carrier and attention. Parents help baby remain relaxed. PLEASE NOTE: it is definitely not the intention that the baby cries inconsolably during this time. If this is the case, the baby will be given extra feedings and the plan of action should be revised. Longer intervals than 1 hour are of course fine if the baby is sleeping comfortably without assistance and is not showing feedingcues.

In effect this will mean baby is fed 3 to 4 times between 7am and noon.

From noon onwards, parents will resume the familiar feeding pattern: breast with supplementary feeding and pump, or pump and bottle.

If this goes well after 4 days in terms of behaviour and growth, parents can either extend the block by 2 hours or, after an ample supplementary feeding, add a second block from 16.00 to 20.00, for example.

Do the maths: 5 + x = 8

Regular weighing can help determine whether the baby is getting enough or even too much supplementary feed. We know on average what normal growth is and what normal intake per 24 hours is. Combining these parameters can help gauge how effectively baby is drinking at breast.

We know ‘5’: Normal intake is 150 cc per kilogram of body weight per 24 hours in the first month

And we know ‘8’, the outcome we want:  Normal growth in the first 3 months is 25 grams per day

By comparing supplementary feeding against growth, parents (and relevant healthcare professionals) can assess whether supplementary feeding can be reduced.

If a baby is getting 50 % of normal intake by bottle and grows 40 grams a day: it is safe to offer less bottles.

If a baby is getting 50 % of normal intake by bottle and grows 20 grams a day offering less is not yet an option.

This is not just about weight, of course. Also take into account the baby’s behaviour and condition. A baby like Dany who may be doing some catch-up growth may want and need to grow above average. And will thus be able to experience tension if supplementary feeding is reduced too quickly.

 

Approach and result

The first few days on this were very exciting indeed for both parents.

Dany was clearly more restless in the morning with less supplementary feeding (he got 30 cc extra per feeding).

Between 7am and noon, he drank every 1.5 to 2 hours.

Erykah loved having him at the breast and not pumping for a while. But she was also happy that he was definitely getting enough 19 hours a day.

Dany, at 2.9kg, needed 435cc of feedings per 24 hours, and had gotten slightly more than that the week before.
After 4 days on this plan, it turned out that with 350cc of supplementary feeding (pumped milk and formula), he had gained 40g a day. He had also started spitting up significantly more. These signs encouraged Erykah and her partner enough to dare to put in a 2nd block, from 4pm to 8pm.

Erykah also felt her breasts were starting to make more milk. Her breasts felt fuller and she leaked more.  . After 2 weeks, she no longer needed formula in the morning and Dany was still growing fine. Interestingly, after a few days she noticed she did pump more after breastfeeding Dany than when only pumping.

The hardest part for both parents was learning to recognise and interpret Dany’s body language. Certainly his father struggled with the uncertainty of not knowing if his son could be hungry after all.

And as Dany grew bigger and stronger, he was awake and alert for longer and longer periods after feedings. In those fragile first weeks Dany fell into a deep sleep immediately after the bottle, and they had learned that that was THE signal of ‘enough’.

Was, and now it wasn’t. Because Dany was growing and developing and spending more time just awake.

His parents also had difficulty recognising stopping signals in their baby. They had learned to recognise feeding signals very well in those first vulnerable days. But they interpreted all Dany’s signs to stop  as either cramps or hunger.

If he let the milk drain from the corners of his mouth halfway through the bottle, his parents interpreted that as ‘he is too tired to drink properly’. And that was possibly true in his first days and weeks of life, but well over 3 kilos he was strong enough. Now letting milk run off meant he did have enough.

So did his restless little hands around the bottle. And him coming off the breast or bottle milkdrunk, then waking to look around and only after 30-45 minutes later getting restless again.

Both parents faced the challenge of revisiting body language to see what Dany was signalling now that he was a firmer baby.

Eventually for them the transition to exclusive breastfeeding was too daunting, and milk production remained too low to feed 100%. Erykah found that she could breastfeed without supplementing until late afternoon, but for the evening and night, they preferred to supplement with some formula instead of investing more time and energy in stimulating her milkproduction even more. Live was finally setteling, and they were ok with combined feeding.

After 4 weeks they noticed that Dany was gaining more than 350 grams per week and as father said ‘even we can see he is getting 3 double chins’, they felt confident enough to reduce the formula even further.

In the end, the combination of breast and bottle feeding (no pumping unless Erykah was away around feedingtime) gave both parents the peace of mind they needed to enjoy breastfeeding.

Prevention

Preventing unnecessary supplementary feeding starts with good knowledge about and support for normal baby restlessness and weight loss.

And that applies to parents as well as healthcare professionals and the network around them.

It seems so easy, ‘just give some supplementary feeding’, but in the longer term many parents still turn out to remain uncertain for a long time. And there are plenty of reasons to be cautious about supplementary feeding, including supplementary feeding with pumped milk.

It understandable when as a healthcare professional you get a call at 4am from worried parents with a restless baby, or a baby with low temp.

Describing the need for supplementary feeding as ‘very common’ or ‘that is very often needed for a while’ is a vote of no confidence in women’s ability to feed their babies. It implies that it is very common for a mother to be unable to feed her baby safely on her own. Physiologically, it is not ‘normal’ that that would be necessary so often.

Parents need information about milkproduction:

  • There is milk in the first days, it’s just not white! The expression ‘it takes 3 days for your milk to come in’ has apparently lost a word, the word “White’.
  • Babys loose weight after birth, even those on formula.
  • Restlessness  around the second night/third day is a given.

In practice, it appears that in hospitals and in the homecare in the Netherlands, pumping and supplementary feeding are strongly encouraged s early as at 7% weight loss. And in addition the advice to start supplementary feeding is quickly given when the baby is restless or has a low temperature, even without the indication of actual weightloss.

There are studies indicating that supplementary feeding with small bits of artificial milk has no adverse effect on breastfeeding duration. There are doubts about suckling confusion when early introduction of the bottle in addition to the breast. And not every mother makes ample milk for her baby as easily and quickly.

But there are proven issues with supplementary feeding in the first days of life.
Pumping alongside or in combination with breastfeeding is a strain on the family. Mother feeds the pump and gives the bottle to her baby. And pump rental and purchase cost money.
Supplementary feeding has disadvantages: there is a risk of overfeeding, pumping changes the microbiome of the breast and the pumped milk, artificial feeding affects the baby’s gut flora, and using plastic bottles burdens a baby with far more microplastics than breastfeeding does.
And with the new findings that early introduction of artificial milk-based formula increases the chances of developing cow’s milk protein allergy, preventing supplementary feeding is even more worthwhile.

In short: prevention of supplementary feeding should be higher on the agenda of healthcare professionals as far as I am concerned.

The 1st week

Restlessness on the 2nd night is a real experience for many parents, and when unprepared, the conclusion is often ‘there is insufficient milk so supplementary feeding is needed’. Predicting this normal restlessness during pregnancy and in the 1st 24-48 hours postpartum reduces the likelihood of unnecessary supplementary feeding when the issue arises.

Use of the special growth curve for weight loss in breastfed babies in the first 10 days can help parents and those around them to properly estimate normal weight loss.

After a labour with a lot of intravenous fluid in the last 2 hours before birth, the baby may have a biased high birth weight. After a c-section some babies lose 200 or more grams within 24 hours. If there are no other clinical red flags this is probably just extra  fluid and not a concern. Discuss this with parents. A father once remarked after this explanation ‘so my son was a cheap chicken filet?’ Ummm, yes I’m afraid so. His son, with beautiful pink plump body, was lying delightfully skin to skin on his mother and certainly did not look like a baby who had lost 9% weight or who was in jeapardy.

Good latching is essential in the first hours and days after birth. Possibly because colostrum does not yet have much volume, pressure on the areola seems almost more important than the letdown reflex to get the colostrum flowing. ‘Nipple feeding’ is then not only painful for mother but also provides the baby with no or too little nourishment AND the experience that drinking at the breast requires a lot of energy for little. Pain is not gain when breastfeeding is concerned. Small changes in posture or control can already have an effect on both mother’s and baby’s experience.

Hand-pumping and offering those drops to baby on a spoon is a more approachable intervention than using a pump. If parents are aware of this option before delivery, and if mothers give it a try in the last weeks of pregnancy (in the shower, when no one is looking?) then the threshold for using this postpartum is lower.

And if supplementary feeding is needed in the first week, consider not doing it consistently after drinking at the breast. Consider Pavlov: getting satiated with the bottle is not conducive to more confidence in breastfeeding/feeding.

If a baby keeps getting satiated by supplementary feeding (be it bottle or finger or cup), then the breast will remain ‘hard work’ for all concerned and the becomes the bottle’s reward. Alternate when supplementary feeding is offered: sometimes after 2 breasts, sometimes after the 1st breast and then the 2nd breast after the supplementary feeding, or after 2 breasts and then back to the first for a while.

If the baby stops taking the breast halfway through the feeding after supplementary feeding, too much supplementary feeding may have been given. Or try supplementary feeding during the feeding with a tube next to the nipple. This is laborious, but it doesn’t have to be 24 hours a day. The experience at the breast is more positive even if the baby gets supplementary feeding during daytime drinking from the breast, and at night with the bottle.

Or use the block method described in this case study even in the first week.

The first 3 months

An additional risk of supplementary feeding alongside breastfeeding is the increased risk of obesity, both from overfeeding and from disturbances of the microbiome.

To reduce the risk of overfeeding, good information about body language in babies is essential. Discuss the ‘restaurant effect’: you resolve not to have dessert, do it anyway and an hour later you regret it because you are too full. Discuss that even adults don’t eat until all we can/will do is binge on the sofa. That’s fine sometimes, but if you always do that, you’ll get too fat and probably not happier.

Normal behaviour after a feeding:

  • Relaxing or even ‘drunk’ release
  • Waking up after a few minutes and looking around for 5-45/90 min* with fluid movements
  • *depending on age and time
  •  Then restless, jerky movement, searching = tired

This is often interpreted as hunger. Then check with baby what the response is to (supplementary) feeding:

  • Does she lie down to drink delightfully again and is calm afterwards? Then she needed it.
  • Does she lie down to drink delightfully again and is inconsolable afterwards? Then she ate too much.
  • Does she lie down to suckle but let go as soon as the milk starts flowing (breast) or after the first sips (bottle)? Then she is full.
  • Is she not latching on or can’t find the nipple/teat properly? Then she is either full or a burp is bothering her.

And discuss that a baby will always drink something from a bottle. Most babies do not stop drinking when they have had enough. Certainly not if they get the bottle after the breast.

People eat the most and tend to over-eat when:

  • The meal consists of different textures: crunchy and creamy, for example.
  • The meal contains different flavours: sweet-sour, salty-sweet for example. After a main course with rice, we eat less of a dessert with rice.
  • Little effort is needed to eat: because the food is offered and/or goes easily into the mouth (ice cream for example)

Bottle after breast meets all these criteria to promote over-eating:

  • The breast is soft and requires a different approach and sucking technique than the harder bottle teat.
  • Pumped milk and/or formula tastes different, and has a different temperature. With most bottles, milk flows quite spontaneously into the mouth regardless of how full the bottle is. A more empty breast flows more slowly towards the end of feeding.

When combining breastfeeding and supplementary feeding, regular weighing is therefore necessary to prevent overfeeding and thus possible obesity.

After 3 months

At around 3 months of age baby’s sucking reflex starts to fade out. This is when babies may start to refuse the bottle. But they can also start to prefer the bottle: breast refusal.

My strong impression is that this is more likely if a baby has been given supplementary feeding in the first months because breastfeeding was not working well and there were concerns about enough milk for the baby. My explanation is that these babies have had the experience that the breast is hard work and that satiety lies with the bottle. And in addition parents also often unconsciously or consciously trust the bottle more than the breast.

Breastfeeding changes around 3 months. Breastfeeding is getting easier and more comfortable:

  • Breasts become supple again, while making the same amount of milk or more
  • Babies start drinking faster
  • Many babies start drinking the first breast for shorter periods than the 2nd
  • The feeding position has to adapt to a bigger and more curious baby

This is very similar to what parents experience when there is too little milk in the first days/weeks or latching on does not work well. So then it seems obvious to conclude that there is too little milk again, or that the baby has a setback/regression. And if the bottle is then given, that image is reinforced to and by both parents and baby.

Aim to avoid rewarding issues with one kind of feeding (breast or bottle) with the other (bottle or breast):

  •  If the baby struggles with the bottle: verbalise that this is ‘a bit silly’, distract him for 10 minutes and give him the breast elsewhere. Or (if bottle refusal is really an issue) offer the bottle again.
  • If the baby is struggling about the breast: verbalise that that is ‘bit silly’, distract for 10 minutes and give bottle in another place. Or if there really seems to be an infant strike, offer fine body contact and offer the breast again a little later.

But breast and bottle refusal are 2 separate and complex stories, which will be covered elsewhere.

Careful handling of supplementary feeding can hopefully prevent breast refusal, which is nicer than having to cure.

References

Great article for overview: Walker M. Formula Supplementation of Breastfed Infants: Helpful or Hazardous? ICAN: Infant, Child, & Adolescent Nutrition. 2015;7(4):198-207. doi:10.1177/1941406415591208

And further:

    1. Valerie J. FlahermanJoan MurungiCarlito BaleStephanie DickinsonXiwei ChenFlavia NamiiroJolly NankundaLance M. PollackVictoria LaleauMi-Ok KimDavid B. AllisonAmy Sarah GinsburgAugusto Braima de SaVictoria Nankabirwa; Breastfeeding and Once-Daily Small-Volume Formula Supplementation to Prevent Infant Growth Impairment. Pediatrics January 2024; 153 (1): e2023062228. 10.1542/peds.2023-062228
    2. Haschke F, Grathwohl D, Haiden N. Metabolic Programming: Effects of Early Nutrition on Growth, Metabolism and Body Composition. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2016;86:87-95. doi: 10.1159/000442728. Epub 2016 Jun 23. PMID: 27337043.
    3. Kelly E, DunnGalvin G, Murphy BP, O’B Hourihane J. Formula supplementation remains a risk for cow’s milk allergy in breast-fed infants. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019; 30: 810–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.13108
    4. Kouwenhoven SMP, Muts J, Finken MJJ, Goudoever JBV. Low-Protein Infant Formula and Obesity Risk. Nutrients. 2022 Jun 30;14(13):2728. doi: 10.3390/nu14132728. PMID: 35807908; PMCID: PMC9268498.
    5. Tender JA, Janakiram J, Arce E, Mason R, Jordan T, Marsh J, Kin S, Jianping He, Moon RY. Reasons for in-hospital formula supplementation of breastfed infants from low-income families. J Hum Lact. 2009 Feb;25(1):11-7. doi: 10.1177/0890334408325821. Epub 2008 Oct 29. PMID: 18971505.
    6. Tetsuhiro Sakihara, Kenta Otsuji, Yohei Arakaki, Kazuya Hamada, Shiro Sugiura, Komei Ito, Ulfman L, Tsuang A, Sprikkelman AB, Goh A, van Neerven RJJ. Relevance of Early Introduction of Cow’s Milk Proteins for Prevention of Cow’s Milk Allergy. Nutrients. 2022 Jun 27;14(13):2659. doi: 10.3390/nu14132659. PMID: 35807839; PMCID: PMC9268691.
    7. Urashima M, Mezawa H, Okuyama M, Urashima T, Hirano D, Gocho N, Tachimoto H. Primary Prevention of Cow’s Milk Sensitization and Food Allergy by Avoiding Supplementation With Cow’s Milk Formula at Birth: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Dec 1;173(12):1137-1145. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3544. PMID: 31633778; PMCID: PMC6806425.
    8. Whipps MDM, Yoshikawa H, Demirci JR, Hill J. Estimating the Impact of In-Hospital Infant Formula Supplementation on Breastfeeding Success. Breastfeed Med. 2021 Jul;16(7):530-538. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0194. Epub 2021 Jun 10. PMID: 34115545.